Wow, this article is about a motion to dismiss being denied. Let me explain to you why this is amateur hour, Tim:

A motion to dismiss a lawsuit is a procedural step of a legal process that occurs practically EVERY time a lawsuit is filed. When any trial happens, the judge has decided that some potential exists for the plaintiff to prevail and that’s why the motion to dismiss is denied. Not that the judge thinks that the plaintiff will prevail. Not at all. Simply that the Plaintiff might have a chance.

Trial begins and all things are square. Judge has no favor. Learn that day one of law school more or less.

And yet you write this story as if the judge has decided the case. You do not understand what is going on. Or you do understand and you’re being blatantly biased for some other reason. Let the judge and/or jury decide and then report what the decision makers actually said when it matters. Sir, you are the problem with this industry.

A motion to dismiss a lawsuit is a procedural step of a legal process that occurs practically EVERY time a lawsuit is filed. When any trial happens, the judge has decided that some potential exist for the plaintiff to prevail and that’s why the motion to dismiss is denied. Not that the judge thinks that the plaintiff will. Not at all. Simply that the Plaintiff might have a chance.

Trial begins and all things are square. Judge has no favor.

And yet you write this story as if the judge has decided. You do not understand what is going on. Or you do understand and you’re being blatantly biased for some other reason. Let the judge and/or jury decide and then report what the decision makers actually said when it matters. Sir, you are the problem with this industry.